Links & Publications

Publications

  1. Heger, T.; Jeschke, J.M.; Febria, C.; Kollmann, J.; Murphy, S.; Rochefort, L.; Shackelford, N.; Temperton, V.M.; Higgs, E. 2022. Mapping and assessing the knowledge base of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, e13676.
  2. Heger, T.; Zarrieß, S.; Algergawy, A.; Jeschke, J.M.; König-Ries, B. 2022. INAS: interactive argumentation support for the scientific domain of invasion biology. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4, e80457.
  3. Lokatis, S.; Jeschke, J.M. 2022. Urban biotic homogenization: approaches and knowledge gaps. Urban biotic homogenization: approaches and knowledge gaps. Ecological Applications 32, e2703.
  4. Heger, T.; Aguilar-Trigueros, C.A.; Bartram, I.; Braga, R.R.; Dietl, G.P.; Enders, M.; Gibson, D.J.; Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Gras, P.; Jax, K.; Lokatis, S.; Lortie, C.J.; Mupepele, A.-C.; Schindler, S.; Starrfelt, J.; Synodinos, A.D.; Jeschke, J.M. 2021. The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach: a synthesis method for enhancing theory development in ecology and evolution. BioScience 71, 337–349.
  5. Jeschke, J.M.; Heger, T.; Kraker, P.; Schramm, M.; Kittel, C.; Mietchen, D. 2021. Towards an open, zoomable atlas for invasion science and beyond. NeoBiota 68, 5–18.
  6. Enders, M.; Havemann, F.; Ruland, F.; Bernard-Verdier, M.; Catford, J.A.; Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Haider, S.; Heger, T.; Kueffer, C.; Kühn, I.; Meyerson, L.A.; Musseau, C.; Novoa, A.; Ricciardi, A.; Sagouis, A.; Schittko, C.; Strayer, D.L.; Vilà, M.; Essl, F.; Hulme, P.E.; van Kleunen, M.; Kumschick, S.; Lockwood, J.L.; Mabey, A.L.; McGeoch, M.; Palma, E.; Pyšek, P.; Saul, W.-C.; Yannelli, F.A.; Jeschke, J.M. 2020. A conceptual map of invasion biology: integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29, 978–991.
  7. Jeschke, J.; Bartram, I.; Heger, T.; Lokatis, S.; Tockner, K. 2020. Dark Knowledge ans Licht holen. Laborjournal 7–8/2020, 34–37.
  8. Ryo, M.; Jeschke, J.M.; Rillig, M.C.; Heger, T. 2020. Machine learning with the hierarchy-of-hypotheses (HoH) approach discovers novel pattern in studies on biological invasions. Research Synthesis Methods 11, 66–73.
  9. Enders, M.; Havemann, F.; Jeschke, J.M. 2019. A citation-based map of concepts in invasion biology. NeoBiota 47, 23–42.
  10. Jeschke, J.M.; Börner, K.; Stodden, V.; Tockner, K. 2019. Open Access journals need to become first choice, in invasion ecology and beyond. NeoBiota 52, 1–8.
  11. Jeschke, J.M.; Lokatis, S.; Bartram, I.; Tockner, K. 2019. Knowledge in the dark: scientific challenges and ways forward. FACETS 4, 423–441.
  12. Jeschke, J.M.; Heger, T. (eds) 2018. Invasion biology: hypotheses and evidence. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
  13. Braga, R.R.; Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Heger, T.; Vitule, J.R.S.; Jeschke, J.M. 2018. Structuring evidence for invasional meltdown: broad support but with biases and gaps. Biological Invasions 20, 923–936.
  14. Enders, M.; Hütt, M.-T.; Jeschke, J.M. 2018. Drawing a map of invasion biology based on a network of hypotheses. Ecosphere 9, e02146.
  15. Lokatis, S.; Jeschke, J.M. 2018. The island rule: an assessment of biases and research trends. Journal of Biogeography 45, 289–303.
  16. Heger, T.; Jeschke, J.M. 2014. The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses. Oikos 123, 741–750.
  17. Jeschke, J.M. 2014. General hypotheses in invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions 20, 1229–1234.
  18. Heger, T.; Pahl, A.T.; Botta-Dukat, Z.; Gherardi, F.; Hoppe, C.; Hoste, I.; Jax, K.; Lindström, L.; Boets, P.; Haider, S.; Kollmann, J.; Wittmann, M.J.; Jeschke, J.M. 2013. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio 42, 527–540.
  19. Jeschke, J.M.; Gómez Aparicio, L.; Haider, S.; Heger, T.; Lortie, C.J.; Pyšek, P.; Strayer, D.L. 2012. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14, 1–20.

Selected links and further publications on the topic

  1. Open Knowledge Maps
  2. Open Science, Dark Knowledge: Science in an Age of Ignorance
  3. Freshwater Information Platform
  4. Conservation Evidence
  5. OneZoom Tree of Life Explorer
  6. Let’s jointly create more real knowledge!
  7. Kraker, P.; Schramm, M.; Kittel, C. 2021. Discoverability in (a) crisis. ABI Technik 41, 3–12.
  8. Burke, P. 2020. The polymath: a cultural history from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
  9. Renn, J. 2020. The evolution of knowledge: rethinking science for the Anthropocene. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  10. Kraker, P. 2018. Illuminating Dark Knowledge. GenR.
  11. Börner, K. 2015. Atlas of knowledge: anyone can map. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  12. Millgram, E. 2015. The great endarkenment: philosophy for an age of hyperspecialization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  13. Hanser, T.; Barber, C.; Rosser, E.; Vessey, J.D.; Webb, S.J.; Werner, S. 2014. Self organising hypothesis networks: a new approach for representing and structuring SAR knowledge. Journal of Chemoinformatics 6, 21.
  14. Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a democratic society. Prometheus, Amherst, NY.
  15. Börner, K. 2010. Atlas of science: visualizing what we know. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  16. Keim, D.; Kohlhammer, J.; Ellis, G.; Mansmann, F. 2010. Mastering the information age: solving problems with visual analytics. Eurographics, Goslar.
  17. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A. and Balakireva, L. 2009 Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS ONE, 4, e4803.